![]() The effigy at the beginning seemed to be a symbolic representation of the main creature behind the giant tentacles. Evidence of such a ritual can be seen on the camera when it was playing back a recorded video, which shows three kneeling persons in a circle, dressed identically to the cult leader upon discovery. The entity itself was either attracted or summoned to the location through the ritual, which involves the house, the symbol, and the mirror. This also links the entity with the mirror through the common element of the camera.īased on the evidence, the anomaly was caused by a ritual performed within the house. What matters is that the action is invariably lethal, and therefore links the two objects (camera and mirror) conclusively. Epsilon-6 S-1-6's cause of death was suicide via self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head after viewing the mirror through the camera, so it cannot be assumed to be either a cognitohazard or infohazard. The mirror is locked in the basement, and is implied to be a debilitating or lethal cognitohazard when viewed through the camera. Additionally, the attacks did not begin until the first of the symbols were observed through the camera by a member of the task force. The symbols are shown to be present all over the house, written on the walls. This suggests that the cult is not causing the anomaly itself. If the cult was responsible, they were doing so from somewhere unobserved where they could not ensure the safety or security of evidence of the anomaly. The cult leader was neutralized and the house was empty of all other living humans. The remaining possibilities would be the mirror, the symbols, the cult, or a combination of any elements present. Thus, we can reasonably assume that the anomaly did not exist at its current location until approximately 3 months prior to the events of the video. There would also be more anomalous disappearances over a much longer period of time simply due to accidents and exploration. If the anomaly was instead discovered recently, due to a ritual performed within the house, then it seems extremely convenient for the anomaly meant to be discovered to be just north of the location. This would imply either incoherent logic or a sudden change in the demands of the anomaly. ![]() ![]() It would imply that the cult simply waited for 10 years, despite knowing exactly where the anomaly was located, before kidnapping nine people for the tentacles over the course of three months. However, this doesn't seem entirely plausible. ![]() It is possible that the house was simply build next to the anomaly, and that the anomaly was not utilized until three months prior. The first confirmed sighting of anomalous activity associated with this location occurred approximately 12 hours before the briefing shown at the beginning of the video. The movement itself has been around at least since 2010, and the disappearances have all occurred over the course of three months before the events of SCP:O. The timeline of the cult, introduced at the beginning mostly as well as throughout the video, suggests that the cult had existed for some time before the disappearances even occurred. We could assume that the entity itself is the cause, being nothing more than a natural occurrence around which the cult formed itself. This leaves us with a few possibilities The mirror, the symbols, the cult, the entity itself, or a combination of the above. At this point, the camera had not observed anything outside of the building, which rules out the camera as the direct enabling element for this anomaly, as the anomalies are clearly capable of interacting with physical people without first being observed with the camera. This is demonstrated when an operative is killed outside the building by the entity. We can exclude the camera as a direct cause of the anomalies, specifically the invisible entities. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |